STEVEN GERRARD hopes the Scottish FA take Brian Rice’s guilty plea and personal situation into consideration when deciding his fate for breaching betting regulations.
The Hamilton boss revealed on Monday that he had reported himself to the Association after the ‘horrible disease’ of his gambling addiction had come back to haunt him.
Rice previously admitted a three-decade long betting problem in 2013 after friends helped him pay off a £65,000 debt.
The 56-year-old, who expressed his regret in a statement, has been widely backed across the game and Gerrard has given his support to the Accies boss for his brave stance.
He said: “I admire that, but I don’t just admire Brian of that. It’s because of the conversations we’ve had. Since I came up to Scotland, he has been nothing but a gentleman.
“He is someone who has been around my position of coaching and management for a lot longer than I have. So there is nothing but respect going towards him.
“And I do admire the fact that he has come out, been brave and is trying to get the help and support he needs. All I can say is that everyone at Rangers is thinking of him at this time.
“For sure [ I hope it encourages others to come forward]. If there are other people doing it, I’m sure they will be looking at Brian and thinking how brave and honest he has been. I’ve got nothing but admiration and respect for that.”
Rice will face a Hampden hearing on January 30 and sanctions range from a three to 16-match ban and a fine of up to £100,000.
Hamilton have vowed to stand by their boss whatever the outcome of that case and Gerrard believes the focus should be on helping Rice to overcome his demons.
“I’d say so,” he said when asked if there should be mitigation in terms of his punishment. “I hope that’s the case that he gets the right support and people rally round him because I think he deserves that.
"I don’t like to see anyone getting punished, really, in football. But I don’t control that or make the decision so we’ll just have to wait and see what happens.
“As I say, I was speaking to Gary Mac about it this morning. He has known the guy for a lot longer than me and he loves him.
"I can see why because every time I have been in his company he has been fantastic."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here