Children may not pass on the coronavirus to adults as easily as they do the flu, a government scientist has suggested.
Professor Jonathan Van-Tam said it does not seem that children are “high-output transmitters” of Covid-19.
Speaking at the daily Downing Street briefing, the deputy chief medical officer for England said “data are pretty sparse at the moment” with regards to children’s ability to transmit the virus to adults.
“But the experts have already had a look at this and formed a conclusion that unlike influenza, unlike flu, where we are very clear that children drive transmission in the community to adults, it really does not seem to be the same kind of signal with Covid-19, that children are not these kind of big high output transmitters as they are with flu,” he added.
He also said that most children have only “extremely mild” Covid-19 symptoms and the infection rate among them is “about the same” as in adults, but “possibly a little lower” in younger aged children.
Last week, Nicola Sturgeon promised ministers will not take a “cavalier” approach when it comes to deciding when to reopen Scotland’s schools.
She made the commitment as teachers’ leaders urged the Scottish Government to state clearly that schools north of the border will not reopen until after the summer holidays.
Unions have criticised what they described as the “cavalier attitude of the UK Government”, saying its plan to start reopening schools on June 1 has “created confusion, concern and fear amongst teachers and parents”.
The issue is raised in a letter sent from members of the teachers panel on the Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) – the body which negotiates teachers’ pay and conditions – to Education Secretary John Swinney.
Des Morris, the teachers panel chair, said in the letter: “It appears to us… that there is a strong argument to maintain a cautionary approach and to reinforce such by indicating schools will reopen after the summer break.”
He said this would “bring clarity to parents, pupils, and teachers” and also provide schools and teachers with a “significant period to plan and prepare for the very real challenge of delivering a blended learning experience for Scotland’s pupils in session 2020/21”.
Ms Sturgeon, speaking at the Scottish Government’s daily coronavirus briefing on Friday, pledged: “There will be no cavalier approach to any aspect of this on the part of the Scottish Government.”
She said it is “far too important and there’s far too much at stake for us not to make all of these judgments in as careful and considered a way as possible”.
Mr Swinney is currently taking part in discussions in a bid to find a “consensus view” on the best way forward, she said.
She added that if there is any return to classes before the summer break, this would be done on a “very limited basis”.
Mr Morris, however, insisted that “a premature and enforced return to schools” would leave some staff “dismayed” and “fearful for their own safety”.
He argued: “The simple fact is that countries which have moved to even the limited reopening of schools have seen a rise in the (coronavirus) reproduction figure – in Denmark, for example, the figure rose from 0.6 to 0.9.
“There is no reason to suggest that Scotland would be any different, especially if school reopening was linked to more people going back to work, which itself will impact on the R number.”
Schools shut to most pupils almost two months ago as lockdown measures were imposed in a bid to curb the spread of Covid-19.
Classes would normally end for the summer in late June, and Mr Morris insisted asking pupils to return for just a week or two would be “approaching meaningless”, and claimed many parents would “see little value in the exercise and almost certainly keep children at home rather than run a risk to their health”.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here