MSPS have unanimously agreed to forego their two-month summer recess to help monitor the Scottish Government’s handling of the coronavirus crisis.
The first regular summer sittings in Holyrood’s history had been proposed by the cross-party bureau which sets parliamentary business.
The formal stamp of approval means there will now be “virtual statement-led sessions” every Thursday in July and early August, with MSPs able to take part in person or online.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is due to make statements in the chamber on July 9 and 30.
Parliament will also resume in full on August 11, the day slated for reopening scotland’s schools, instead of in September.
MSPs also voted to standardise the length of a Holyrood parliament at five years, in line with other UK legislatures, by passing the Scottish Elections (Reform) Bill.
The current term is four years, but this has twice been changed to five years since 2011 to avoid clashes with UK general elections.
The legislation enables all 14-year-olds to register ahead of attaining voting age, and bans people from voting in more than one area in council elections – mirroring the law for Scottish and UK Parliament elections.
There will also be pilots of electronic voting for the blind and disabled voters.
Minister for Parliamentary business Graeme Dey said: "The intention is to underline the importance of ensuring a level playing-field for all voters, regardless of disability, so that they can exercise their democratic right to vote securely and in private."
Sight loss charity RNIB Scotland welcomed the move, saying it would improve the ability of blind and partially sighted people to cast their ballot without the assistance of anyone else.
RNIB Scotland director James Adams said: "We welcome the decision by the Scottish Parliament to look at alternative methods of voting in elections. It's simply not acceptable that people can leave their polling station unsure whether they've correctly voted for the candidate of their choice or feel obliged to ask someone else for help."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here