PATIENTS have told of their frustration over GP appointment delays and a continued reliance on telephone appointments as surgeries work to minimise Covid risks.

A 75-year-old woman, who has previously suffered two heart attacks, said she was told by a practice in North Lanarkshire that “it wasn’t safe to come in” after asking for a check-up because she was experiencing dizzy spells.

Dr Andrew Buist, chairman of BMA Scotland’s GP committee said he would be disappointed to hear of any practices refusing to see patients where necessary because "they are an important part of what we do”. All initial consultations are being done over the phone or online to minimise the number of patients coming into surgeries. 

However, one surgery in the west end of Glasgow, when contacted, said it was not holding any face-to-face appointments, while a patient in Hamilton in South Lanarkshire said she was told by a receptionist it was “telephone or nothing”.

READ MORE: Coronavirus Live: 10-fold increase in school pupils developing virus sparks teacher fears 

GPs say they are coping with “unprecedented” demand, caused by a “perfect storm” of patients coming forward after delaying seeking help during lockdown, coupled with flu vaccine calls and Covid-19-related enquiries against a backdrop of staff shortages.

One doctor told last week how he was having to correct hospital consultants who were advising patients that GPs are not seeing patients in person.

A patient from North Lanarkshire says she contacted her GP asking if she could have a check-up because she was concerned about symptoms after suffering previous heart attacks.

She said: “My husband has been very unwell and I’ve been under stress for 18 months.

“Just recently I’ve been having light-headedness.

"I thought I would phone and ask if I could have a general check. I phoned on Wednesday and got through very quickly, which is not normally the case. I explained I had been under stress, that my husband has cancer. 

“The receptionist said she would put me through and I waited 38 minutes and 24 seconds to speak to the nurse or doctor.

Then whoever it was said, “I don’t think it’s safe enough for you to come down’.

“She said ‘Are you having high blood pressure?’. I replied, ‘I don’t know, that’s one of the reasons I wanted a check. I’ve had two heart attacks before.’ I tried seven times and then gave up. 

READ MORE: 'I know first hand how hard GPs are working'

“It’s safe enough to go shopping, it’s safe enough to got to a restaurant but it’s not safe enough to go to the doctor’s.”

There are fears the shift to telemedicine will also have an adverse effect on poorer or elderly patients.

Linda Bauld, Professor of Public Health at Edinburgh University, said: “The problem with digital medicine is that you do exclude a section of society. 
“We are never going to go back to the model we had before and I think the public needs to get the message that this is the new reality.

“I know people might find that frustrating but surgeries are still open for business and 
trying very hard to see as many patients.”

A Scottish group that works with older people said it was concerned elderly people were struggling to reach GPs.

A spokeswoman for the group said: “The feedback from seniors is frustration. They speak to a receptionist and if they deem the call non-urgent, they advise to call back, or it is explained that the GP is only attending to emergencies.

“Some of them tell me they don’t want to bother the GP, as they know they are busy, and struggle through pain and discomfort, unnecessarily - that’s their mind-set on it, they, “get on with it”.

“Medication/prescription on repeat or items to be added to the prescription can be mixed up too, if someone has been discharged form hospital and it’s been changed.

“The GP is very important to them, they are very trusting of the GP and their advice.”