I AM surprised that the practice of publishing the cost of food in the Palace of Westminster has lapsed and many pages have been withdrawn. However, it seems that a three-course meal in the House in 2019 (duck terrine, rib-eye steak and a crumble) would have cost something less than £20.
This contrasts with the expected cost of parcels for those in food poverty of around £30 for a full week, and even then, the food actually delivered by Government contractors can be purchased at a supermarket for a fraction of that cost. The Government has refused to increase the minimum wage, has callously allowed employers to sack their workers and then re-employ them at much reduced pay and conditions and, finally, imposed a pay freeze on the majority of public-sector workers.
Although the benefit freeze is due to end this year, it is expected that the rise will be 1.7%, less than £30 for those on Universal Credit. MPs received a pay rise of 3.1% this year, and a 2.7% rise the year before. How can this blatant self-interest be justified, in total contradiction with the Tories expressed intention of governing in the interests of all the people of the UK? No wonder faith in politicians is at an all-time low and Scots are looking forward to taking control of their own affairs.
Pete Rowberry
Duns
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel