Livingston reveal SPFL investigation vote but claim they did not seek Neil Doncaster suspension

Livi voted in favour of an independent investigation, though it was not passed as the majority of the 42 member clubs voted against, meaning clubs could not secure the percentage needed to push the probe through. 

The Lions explained that an investigation, they feel, would have helped "break barriers" currently in place due to division between clubs and the governing body. But they explained that they were not seeking the suspension of Doncaster or Rod McKenzie, as Rangers had previously done.

The statement read: "Livingston Football Club would like to inform our fans of the reasons why we felt it appropriate to vote for an independent investigation, primarily into the process and governance issues that came to the forefront over the last 3-4 weeks. We would also like to emphasise that we were not calling for any resignations or suspensions whilst fully supportive of a thorough independent investigation. 

"This has mainly stemmed from trust issues that have arisen and grown since the 'missing' Dundee vote. Subsequent verbal disagreements that have been played out in the media. This division between clubs has created barriers that we need to try to heal at the earliest opportunity. 

"We feel an investigation would have been the first hurdle in a process that would hopefully bring everyone back on the same page. When finished, and with clarity provided, this would allow us all to get on with the task in hand which is saving our football clubs with collective action. 

"An investigation into the processes and procedures surrounding and emerging from this vote, we felt. was paramount to offer a level of transparency which would hopefully allow us all to move forward in tandem."

The Premiership club also confirmed their disappointment at the breakdown in discussions over potential league reconstruction, insisting the prospect did not get the "respect it deserved" and was not seriously considered for long enough.

Livi also claim it is "unbelievable" that clubs, through little fault of their own, could be relegated without a full season being played out. They continued: "Following on from the missing Dundee vote, but linked; it was widely believed that serious dialogue would take place concerning league reconstruction. The Joint Response Group put a massive amount of time and energy into this process and we felt it didn't receive the respect it so deserved. 

"In our opinion it was far too briskly dealt with. We voted for the resolution on the understanding that league reconstruction was a distinct possibility but very early in the process it became apparent this was never going to get off the ground. This disappointed us.

"It is our firm belief that no team in Scotland should be adversely affected by the coronavirus crisis that we find ourselves in. It's simply unbelievable that, on top of the challenges we face, we see fellow teams finding themselves relegated while others are adversely affected via being unable to compete for promotion. 

"The impact of this could hamper teams for many years to come. We had an opportunity collectively to change the landscape of Scottish football by creating a proper pyramid structure with the introduction of the Highland and Lowland league's while embracing change and bringing a competitive edge that this introduction would have instilled. 

"Instead, we have failed as an organisation in our opinion to grasp the bigger picture and repair the trust breakdown that has been allowed to manifest for weeks if not longer. 

"We will, as a club, respect the democratic process and give every club our support going forward. Our football club will always be open - our doors and phones lines always open and available to any club that feels they need help. 

"There are tougher times ahead and we will only get through this crisis by collective action and with fellow members all working together."